Which of the following is NOT a criteria for exemption from subdivision platting?

The correct answer identifies a criterion that does not qualify for exemption from subdivision platting. In the context of land development and subdivision regulations, a plat is a map that outlines the divisions of land, and exemptions typically aim to streamline the process for certain types of land transfers or developments.

While it is true that public streets laid out can indicate a level of development that typically requires platting to ensure proper planning and infrastructure is in place, this alone does not provide a basis for exemption. The criteria for exemption generally revolve around the characteristics of the lots, their size, and the intent of their ownership, rather than the presence or layout of public streets.

On the other hand, the other options—lots being over 10 acres, all parts being transferred to owners of the original tract, and no further development planned—are commonly recognized factors that could justify an exemption from the rigorous subdivision platting process. These options reflect scenarios where the complexity and regulatory oversight associated with subdividing land may not be warranted. By contrast, the presence of public streets often implies that there is an intent for further development or subdivision, which means that a platting review would still be necessary.

Understanding these distinctions is crucial for anyone preparing for a surveyor exam, as they directly relate